When Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the Wittenberg Cathedral, the Augustinian priest ignited a firewall that continues to separate Catholics and Protestants down to this day. At the heart of his question was the abuse of indulgences, but he ultimately attacked the firewall upon which the doctrine was built—Purgatory—in order to make his point. Unfortunately, the debate still rages today, not necessarily because of Purgatory itself but because of all of the ancillary issues attached to it: Atonement, Penance, Tradition, Development of Doctrine, and Authority. In an age of exaggerated ecumenism, we tend to ignore those doctrines like Purgatory that ultimately lead to division. Ignoring the truth is never a good idea, especially when the truth is a practical one. Purgatory is perhaps the most practical of doctrines; many of those who don’t believe in it now will experience it first-hand in the not too distant future. But it also is important to have a ready explanation for it because it is also a “head-pin” doctrine; knock it down and many of the aforementioned obstacles will fall with it.
The most common argument against it is that it is not Scriptural. We have spoken any number of times in the past about the rule of faith being implicit within Sacred Scripture and the need for Tradition to make it explicit. In other words, doctrines like Purgatory need not be explicit in Scripture only implicit. We will not traverse that well-worn path yet again. It is mentioned because we need not necessarily have this discussion regarding Purgatory. If we dig a little deeper into Scripture then we will find that Purgatory is a common theme, so much so that we can offer a strictly Scriptural defense of it.
St. Thomas said that, when arguing with an opponent, we should always argue using terms and sources of authority that they agree with. For example, when discussing some aspect of morality with a non-Christian, we should not cite the Bible but instead Natural Law. We can certainly show how the Bible agree with that source of authority, but to obstinately stick to the Bible when they think it mythical is foolish. A similar thing happens with Catholics and the doctrine of Purgatory. Second Maccabees (2 Maccabees 12:39-46) clearly points to a belief in Purgatory. The problem is that Protestants don’t accept that book as inspired. By referencing them it seems to only prove their point that Purgatory is a Catholic fabrication, yet it still remains the go-to texts from the Old Testament.
St. Francis de Sales and the Argument from Scripture
Throughout post-Reformation history, there is perhaps no one better than St. Francis de Sales at converting Protestants. Some estimate that he was responsible for over 70,000 conversions in his lifetime. It is therefore instructive to look at how he presented this divisive doctrine. He did not argue from Tradition or even mention 2Maccabees, but instead gave a strict Biblical defense using Protestant accepted texts. Given his success rate and the fact that most of these texts are rarely cited, it is educative to review what he said (Catholic Controversy, Appendix II).
It without saying that Catholics and Protestants both agree that Christ’s Blood is the true purgatory. But the question still remains how and when that purgation is applied. For the saintly Bishop of Geneva and the thousands he converted there was a simple reasoning process: if there are passages which speak of purgation after death then there must be a place (call it Purgatory since the name is never given us) where this purgation occurs for purgation can happen neither in hell (where “the worm does not die” Mk 9:48) or in heaven (where “nothing unclean may enter it” Rev 21:27).
St. Francis begins where many of the Fathers of the Church, those who spoke the great Amen to God’s Revelation, began, in Psalm 66. There the Psalmist speaks of being led out into the spacious place by passing through fire (Ps 66:12). Likewise, Isaiah 4:4 speaks of being cleansed by a spirit of burning.
St. Francis also refers to Christ’s teaching on the Sermon of the Mount where he cautions about the punishments attached to anger (Mt 5:22-26). Our Lord suggests different levels of punishment, with only the latter meriting hell. For the other two, Jesus speaks of a prison of sorts that one can leave saying, “truly, I say to you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny” (5:26). Building on this theme, St. Paul refers to a man who is saved “as through fire” (1 Cor 3:11-15).
Praying for the Dead
All of this points to a time and place of purgation, but, absent a connection to Tradition, one could argue that this purgation occurs in this life. The problem with that interpretation however is the abundance of Scriptural examples of people praying for the dead. St. Francis begins by referring to David’s prayer and fasting for Saul and Jonathan after their deaths—”And they mourned and wept and fasted until evening for Saul and for Jonathan his son and for the people of the LORD and for the house of Israel, because they had fallen by the sword” (2 Sam 1:12). Likewise, we find St. Paul praying for his departed friend Onesiphorous (1 Tim 1:16-18).
He also explains two other often problematic texts by referring to Purgatory. The Mormons often justify their habit of literally vicariously baptizing the dead by referring to Paul’s text in the fifteenth chapter of First Corinthians (1 Cor 15:29). St. Francis says that when Paul speaks of being baptized for the dead he does not mean it in the literal sense, but as an exhortation to offer sufferings for the dead. He says that St. Paul is using Baptism in the same manner as Christ did when He speaks of His baptism of afflictions and penances undertaken in Luke 12:49-50—I have come to set the earth on fire, and how I wish it were already blazing! There is a baptism with which I must be baptized, and how great is my anguish until it is accomplished!”. Notice how Our Lord references to a fire in this rather clear passage.
Perhaps his most convincing passage prooftext is the last one he refers to: Philippians 2:10. St. Paul says that that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, of those in heaven and on earth and under the earth”. In particular, St. Francis is concerned with a proper interpretation of those “under the earth”. To assume that refers to those in hell would contradict Scripture— ”For there is no one in death, that is mindful of thee: and who shall confess to thee in hell?” (Ps 6:5, c.f. Isaiah 38:18). Instead those “under the earth” refers to “holy souls in Purgatory”, that is the Church Suffering. St. Paul’s hymn is making reference to the Church in all her members in heaven, on the earth and in Purgatory. Ultimately then, there is no firewall between the Church’s members nor should there be between Catholics and Protestants.