Throughout the history of the Church, one of the distinguishing marks of heretical movements has been the relaxing or abolishment of the requirements of clerical celibacy. Whether it was the Arians, the Lutherans, or the Anglicans, the abandonment of this “hard teaching” has been a common thread. One might even say that it is a tell-tale sign that it is the spirit of man at work rather than the Spirit of God. And in this regard the current Germazonians who are lobbying for the Church to abandon the requirement for a celibate priesthood are no different.
To see why it is such a giveaway as to the presence of merely human solutions, we must first admit to the supernatural origin of the priesthood. It is the “Lord of the harvest that gives the Church her priests” and when He doesn’t respond as expected, it is up to men to pray Him to send more laborers. It is not up to men to move to harvest from different fields. Put another way, the celibate priesthood is a sign of the Divine origin of the priesthood. It was Our Lord Himself who told us that “Not all can accept this word [continence for the priesthood], but only those to whom that is granted” (Mt 19:11). It is the priest who is an alter Christus, another Christ, who offers His same sacrifice. As a sign of his authority to do so, the priest is given the supernatural ability to conform his own life to Christ’s celibate gift of Himself. In short, celibacy is the mark that can’t be faked. The power to maintain continence is the sign that Christ has put His stamp of approval on the Priest and is the distinguishing mark of the Priesthood of the Order of Melchizedek.
What About Peter and the Other Apostles?
While Christ Himself was celibate, didn’t he call His future priests, the Apostles, from among married men? Of this we can at least be sure that St. Peter, Our Lord’s first High Priest, was married. We hear of Jesus’ healing Peter’s mother-in-law in Mark’s Gospel (c.f. Mk 1:29-34). In fact St. Paul also mentions that the Bishop should only have been married once (1Tim 3:2). How do we reconcile this with what was said above? Perhaps more to the point, doesn’t this simply mean that celibate priesthood is merely a discipline that can be exercised and relaxed according to circumstances?
In order to avoid such a superficial interpretation of the evidence, we must dig a little deeper. When we do, we find that in the early Church there was actually a two-pronged obligation for the cleric. He was either not to marry, or if, being married when he was called, he would need to renounce the rights of marriage and live as a celibate. When Peter is gaging the price of following Christ, He tells Our Lord that the Apostles have “given up our possessions and followed you.” Our Lord then tells the Apostles that they must also renounce marriage, and if married, the rights of marriage: “Amen, I say to you, there is no one who has given up house or wife or brothers or parents or children for the sake of the kingdom of God who will not receive back an overabundant return in this present age and eternal life in the age to come” (Lk 18:28-30).
The Law of Continence
The law of continence is found to be part and parcel of the priesthood in general. Even the Levitical Priests during their time of service in the Temple were required to practice temporary continence. Because the priesthood of the New Covenant essentially offers daily sacrifice their time of service is perpetual. The Apostles would have known this and practiced it as evidenced by the fact that the Church consistently affirms that the practice has its origin with the Apostles:
“When at the past council the matter on continence and chastity was considered, those three grades, which by a sort of bond are joined to chastity by their consecration, to wit bishops, presbyters, and deacons, so it seemed that it was becoming that the sacred rulers and priests of God as well as the Levites, or those who served at the divine sacraments, should be continent altogether, by which they would be able with singleness of heart to ask what they sought from the Lord: so that what the apostles taught and antiquity kept, that we might also keep.”
Council of Carthage Canon 3
During these first few centuries, men could only renounce the use of marriage with the consent of their wives. But abuses of the requirement continued until the Gregorian reforms of the Church in the 11th and 12th Centuries. It was not until the Council of Trent that the Church ceased calling candidates to the priesthood from married men. By creating a system of seminaries, most of which began educating the candidates at a young age, the floodgates of celibate men entering the priesthood were opened.
Calling married men to the priesthood then is not unprecedented, even if it has not happened in a long time. But in no time in history has the celibacy requirement been relaxed because it is believed to be of Apostolic origin. If married men of the Amazonian region are to be called to the priesthood then they must be willing to renounce the rights of their marriage. This would likely mean no longer living with their wives, even as “brother” and “sister”. This aspect of renouncing the rights of marriage was not mention either in the Final Synod document or in Pope Francis’ Apostolic Exhortation. It would seem that in keeping with Apostolic Tradition that this would be an important detail to discuss.