Carl Linnaeus was an Eighteenth-Century Swedish Biologist who first adopted the binomial nomenclature for naming organisms. In so doing, he dubbed man has homo sapiens or “wise man”. If Linnaeus was to have witnessed mankind’s evolution, not through random mutation, but through political correctness, he might dub him homo insapiens instead. Modern man is a lot of things, but wise is most certainly not one of them. For all of the supposed progress that modernity has offered, the threat of a new Dark Ages remains a real possibility.
Linnaeus’ choice of the participle sapiens to describe man was a recognition of the fact that among all of the species, only man has the capacity for wisdom. It is, in a very real sense, his specific difference. But it is only a capacity and not a biologically determined inevitability. It is his destiny, but only if he accepts it as his vocation. He must both value it, pursue it and come to love it.
Wisdom and Philosophy?
In order to do this, we must first admit that most of us don’t know what wisdom is. The wise man knows the right ordering of things; not just some things, but all things. He knows what the first things are so he can put them first, what the second things are so you can put them second, and so on. It is only by acknowledging and choosing according to this order right order that he can be truly fulfilled. Wisdom isn’t “no” but “instead of”. To put it in philosophical terms, wisdom is to judge all things according to their final causes or purposes.
Accepting his sapiential vocation means that man strives to become a lover of wisdom. He becomes a philosopher, not because he enjoys esoterica, but because he is a man. Man can no more avoid being a philosopher than he can avoid thinking. He will see the world according to his own first principles. The choice then is not about whether he will be a philosopher but about his philosophy. Will it be as Chesterton puts it, “thought that has been thought out” or will it be the “unconscious acceptance of broken bits of some incomplete philosophy” that comes in “nothing but phrases that are, at their best, prejudices”?
The Antidote to PC Culture
Ultimately then, Political Correctness in all its forms is perhaps the greatest threat to mankind today. I say this without any danger of succumbing to hyperbole. By serving as a substitution for thought, it threatens to make us into something less than human. At the heart of wisdom, and therefore of any philosophy, is the question why. We cannot order anything without investigating causes. When a philosophy forbids, or at the very least, avoids that question, it becomes a danger to us all. Usually very reserved in his language, GK Chesterton, playing the role of prophet warns of dire consequences:
The best reason for a revival of philosophy is that unless a man has a philosophy certain horrible things will happen to him. He will be practical; he will be progressive; he will cultivate efficiency; he will trust in evolution; he will do the work that lies nearest; he will devote himself to deeds, not words. Thus struck down by blow after blow of blind stupidity and random fate, he will stagger on to a miserable death with no comfort but a series of catchwords; such as those which I have catalogued above. Those things are simply substitutes for thoughts. In some cases they are the tags and tail-ends of somebody else’s thinking. That means that a man who refuses to have his own philosophy will not even have the advantages of a brute beast, and be left to his own instincts. He will only have the used-up scraps of somebody else’s philosophy; which the beasts do not have to inherit; hence their happiness.
The Revival of Philosophy–Why?
So many Catholics feel helpless in the face of modernity, especially as the detritus of secular philosophy continues to overflow into the Church. Whatever the solution, it is clear that no solution will be viable without a cadre of right-thinking Catholics. Only the Scholasticism of St. Thomas offers a complete and coherent explanation of reality that is able to refute political correctness in all its subtle forms. Our enemies, much quicker than us to realize this, have successfully suppressed his thought for several generations. Chesterton thought there needed to be a revival of philosophy, I am saying there needs to be a revival of a specific philosophy. It is time that the Church and all in it sit and the feet of St. Thomas and learn how to be truly wise.
Only the wise man is truly free. He moves about unhindered within the range of reality, seeing and using everything in its specific place. This is why the attack on perennial philosophy is actually an attack against man’s freedom. Controlling a man’s thoughts, controls the man’s actions. Political correctness is enslavement to groupthink. A man who is truly a freethinker, that is one who thinks freely about how to use his freedom, is impossible to control. He sets his sights on the highest things and pursues them with love and zeal. He is a philosopher in the truest sense of the word and enjoys the freedom of right action that always flows from right thought. The future of mankind very much depends upon our decision to be homo sapiens.