The Venerable Bishop Fulton Sheen thought that the demise of Western Culture, specifically American culture, began on the morning of August 6,^,1945.  That was when the United States dropped the first of two nuclear bombs on Japan at Hiroshima.  It was the moment that “blotted out boundaries. There was no longer a boundary between the military and the civilian, between the helper and the helped, between the wounded and the nurse and the doctor, and the living and the dead. For even the living who escaped the bomb were already half dead. So, we broke down boundaries and limits and from that time on the world has said we want no one limiting me! We want no limits, no boundaries.”  As usual, the first televangelist was also a prophet.  Since that fateful day, the boundaries between right and wrong, natural and unnatural, good and evil have all broken down.  This is because, lost amidst the rubble of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was traditional morality and a firm belief in God’s Providence.

By all accounts even down to our own day, dropping the atomic bomb was the only viable option. Continuing to fire-bomb cities like Tokyo was going to kill far more Japanese citizens than the Bomb would ever do and, even more likely, would harden Japanese resolve, leading to a long drawn out war.  A full ground assault would lead to thousands, if not millions, of deaths on both sides.  In order to save American lives then it was necessary to drop the Bomb as both a show of force and a deterrence to any further Japanese aggression.  Many Americans, including the one writing this article would likely never have been born had the Bomb not been dropped.  Thousands of men were headed to Japan with the sure knowledge that they would not return.  To most of them, Harry Truman is a hero who made the best possible decision.

Another man whose existence is linked to “Truman’s Terrible Choice” is George Weigel.  In a web article for First Things last week, he defended Truman saying that he “it was the correct choice” given the options.  Weigel’s logic is paradigmatic for many Catholics and follows from the loss of a traditional morality in favor of, what St. John Paul II condemned in Veritas Splendor –Consequentialism.  In Weigel’s defense, he mentions that consequentialism is wrong in the article, but he still goes on to employ its logic.  Nevertheless, he is defending the indefensible.

The Two Moral Camps

The tradition understanding of morality has always included the notion that there are intrinsically evil acts.  These acts, no matter the circumstances or the intention of the person, can never be ordered towards the good.  Some examples would be the deliberate killing of an innocent person, lying, and adultery.  Among these acts would be the direct targeting and indiscriminate bombing of civilians during a war.  This would include the aforementioned “fire-bombing” of German and Japanese cities as well as the dropping of the Bomb on the two Japanese cities.  When no distinction is made between military and civilian targets then the dropping of any powerful bomb, atomic or otherwise, is always an intrinsically evil act and is akin to mass murder or terrorism.  One can clearly see under this moral paradigm that there could never be any justification for dropping the two bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Consequentialism, on the other hand, evaluates all moral actions based upon the consequences.  It requires a form a moral calculus in which you decide that if there is more good than evil in the consequences of an act then the act is morally permissible.  Consequentialism, as St. John Paul II puts it, “draw[s] the criteria of the rightness of a given way of acting solely from a calculation of foreseeable consequences deriving from a given choice…[and] maintain[s] that it is never possible to formulate an absolute prohibition of particular kinds of behavior” (Veritatis Splendor, 75).  It is, in essence a form of moral relativism, in that leaves all our actions relative to circumstances and the moral calculations of the individual.  With Consequentialism as the guide, the decision to drop the Bomb would depend upon a moral calculation in which the good of American and Japanese lives are weighed against the loss of innocent Japanese lives. 

Consequentialism and Providence

Embedded within Consequentialism is a rejection of Providence.  Not only does the person assume divine status in thinking they can foresee the actual consequences of their actions, but it also assumes that God could ever leave us in a situation when the Good could not be done.  This is the flaw in Weigel’s logic when he says that Truman chose the best option.  No situation falls outside of God’s Providence and therefore no situation leaves us without an option to choose good.  Truman could have chosen otherwise, and his choice could have been in accord with the good.  Perhaps the decision would have been to send the troops in on the ground and allow the men to courageously fight for goodness and truth even to the giving up of their lives.  Giving your life in noble defense of other people is always a good. Or perhaps it was to accept the non-absolute terms for Japanese surrender.  The point though is that God had allowed the circumstances to be as they were and, incapable of causing us to sin, would always include a way to choose the Good. 

Bishop Sheen thought August 6,1945 was the turning point for America because it created a new moral environment.  Large swaths of the population owe their existence to the consequentialist logic of Truman and others.  America herself, in order to avoid facing the music for such a heinous action, adopted Consequentialism as the new moral order.  Gone, thanks to the Freemasonic court-packing of Roosevelt and Truman, was legal reasoning based on natural law.  Gone too is the idea of intrinsically evil acts.  Try explaining to someone about abortion being intrinsically evil and they will get caught up in the consequences of brining an unwanted child into the world.  Or, relevant to today’s political climate, tell them why they cannot support a candidate who promotes and defends intrinsically evil actions.  You will instead get some moral ledger that pits immigration against abortion. 

When Truman decided to drop the Bomb he opened a moral Pandora’s Box in which true moral reasoning was shed in favor of Consequentialism.  Now people with no sense of morality are the ones performing the moral calculus leading to all kinds of evils that have put our society in jeopardy of collapse.  The only way forward is to reconnect Americans to the moral tradition of the Founders.